Peace of the Brave Redux

Saeb Erekat, the Palestinian “chief negotiator,” met yesterday at the White House, and then at the State Department with Condoleezza Rice, and subsequently told a press conference that:

"We urged that as soon as the elections are over that we will see to it that permanent status negotiations on the real issues of Jerusalem, settlement borders and refugees and water are resumed so that we can put an end to this conflict once and for all," said Erekat.

Erekat wants to skip Phase I of the Road Map (dismantlement of terrorist organizations and infrastructure), as well as Phase II (negotiation of a Palestinian state with provisional borders) and just move right to Phase III (final status issues) -- which he promises will “put an end to this conflict once and for all.” 

Of course, if you can’t even carry out your responsibilities under Phase I (in which you agreed to dismantle terrorism by June 30, 2003, and have not commenced it 29 months later), and if you want to skip Phase II altogether (even though you agreed to that too), the chances of your living up to your obligations after Phase III (assuming an “agreement” is reached) are -- not to put too fine a point on it -- in doubt.

Ariel Sharon effectively answered this back on December 18, 2003, at the Herzliya Conference:

The concept behind [the Road Map] is that only security will lead to peace -- and in that sequence. Without the achievement of full security -- within the framework of which terrorist organizations will be dismantled -- it will not be possible to achieve genuine peace, a peace for generations. This is the essence of the Road Map.

The opposite perception, according to which the very signing of a peace agreement will produce security out of thin air, has already been tried in the past and failed miserably.  And such will be the fate of any other plan which promotes this concept.  These plans deceive the public and create false hope. There will be no peace before the eradication of terrorism.

In my view, this was the essence of the disengagement deal that Sharon negotiated with Bush. Erekat surely knows this, but knows it is useful to portray the Palestinians as ready and eager for final status negotiations. 

They may be eager, but they are not ready.  They haven’t even commenced getting ready.

Comments

[Stevin]

Well said. Not only have they demonstrated a complete lack of interest in dismantling their terrorist organizations, they've stated repeatedly their willingness to utilize those organizations for the complete destruction of Israel.
I suggest that Israel completely trash the peace process until the Palestinians make progress in destroying their terrorist groups.

[Dan]

Let's put the issue of the PLO's (obvious) real intentions aside and concentrate on Ariel Sharon for a minute. Disengagement, preemptive separation, preemptive de facto borders, preemptive uprooting of Jewish communities; these are all old leftwing ideas discarded by Israel's left in favor of Oslo. Now that Oslo failed they've been repackaged by Sharon and made to sound like tough talk. American conservatives have been completely hoodwinked by this man, who is doing the devil's work and hiding behind Bush's skirt. The fact is, thanks to Sharon, Gaza is now an enormous staging area for Hamas and Al Qaeda and preparations are being made to expedite travel between Gaza and the West Bank. What's more, after Israel's next election the new Sharon government will clearly be way left-of-center and the Socialist Peretz will have a great deal of influence. Again, all this has been brought on by Sharon, who won in a landslide by campaigning against the very policies he's pursued from day one after becoming PM.

Before long, after the next "intifada" begins, this period will be known as the American conservative movement's Oslo.