The Palestine of Olmert

“We are tired of fighting, we are tired of being courageous, we are tired of winning, we are tired of defeating our enemies….”  -- Israel's Vice Prime Minister Ehud Olmert

The above picture, with the above caption, still appears on the website of the Israel Policy Forum, where Ehud Olmert spoke those words in a formal address at IPF’s 2005 annual dinner (emceed by Arianna Huffington) before 600 people in New York City.

Olmert predicted in that speech that the Gaza disengagement would “bring more security, greater safety, much more prosperity, and a lot of joy . . . .  [E]verything will be changed . . .”  He thought it would be “the beginning of a new pattern of relations between us and the Palestinian Authority . . . a new foundation for economic growth, for cooperation . . . so that the Middle East will indeed become . . . a paradise for all the world. . . .”

It didn’t work out that way.  The Islamic party that told the Palestinians that years of negotiation got them “nothing,” while terror got the Israelis out of Gaza with no concessions at all, won the election the following January, and after that -- hey, Olmert was right -- everything was changed.

Now, as Olmert campaigns on a pledge of another massive unilateral disengagement (the one Ariel Sharon promised would not occur), Haaretz columnist Ari Shavit has had enough.  In a blistering column in today’s issue, he described Olmert’s plan as the “beginning of the end:”

In September 2000, the Palestinians began a terror offensive against Israel. They did this because they refused to accept the Camp David proposal, which promised them the entire Gaza Strip and 91 percent of the West Bank in exchange for full recognition of Israel and an end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

If Ehud Olmert is elected prime minister and implements his convergence plan, then in September 2010 the Palestinians will have sovereignty over the entire Gaza Strip and some 91 percent of the West Bank, and all this without recognizing Israel and without ending the conflict. . . .

At first glance, Olmert's plan appears enchanting . . . Within three years we'll evacuate some 80,000 settlers. Within less than five years, we will undergo a final disengagement from the Palestinians and converge within the borders of a flourishing lowlands country. We will surround our existence with a high wall . . .  So simple. So clear. How did we not think of this sooner. . . .

What Olmert plans to do in the next few years is to establish an armed Hamas state in Judea, Samaria and Gaza. Via the nearly complete withdrawal, Olmert will promise Hamas almost total control in the Palestinian state for generations. The Palestine of Olmert will be hostile, dissatisfied and violent. . . . [and] one that will endanger the very existence of the State of Israel.

In other words, everything will be changed. 

Shavit is a prominent journalist and a person of the left, a supporter of the Gaza disengagement, and someone who interviewed Sharon numerous times (including the day before his stroke) and reported on him for The New Yorker.  As a result, his column has more power and significance than simply its own cogency.  It is worth reading in its entirety, because the above excerpt does not capture its full intensity.

Comments

[J. Lichty]

. . . and few in Israel care. They would rather be identified as moderates or centrists than think at all about history.

[Mordechai]

But he’ll solve the demographic problem!

The one that, based on a false projection starting from a unverified 10-year old base and using unverifiable (and probably erroneous) assumptions, projects that, sometime around 2020, an Arab baby will be born in the West Bank that will make the entire population at that moment West of the Jordan River 50.000001% Arab and thus – presto – delegitimize Israel.

The problem that thus has to be solved right now, in the middle of an existential war. So that everything will be changed.

With that change, however, by 2020 we may have an as-yet-unnamed new holiday commemorating the destruction of Israel in 2012. We will be able to take comfort, however, in the fact that, had it survived, Israel would have been a Jewish state (even according to Palestinian statisticians).

[Devorah W]

Olmert made Gush Katif judenrein and turned it into a terrorist haven. Now, he plans the same for Judea and Samaria, creating Hamastan and jeopardizing the entire state of Israel. He will get worse than jail which he deserves. He will have the condemnation of Jewish history,

[Yael]

This is how bad things are: When I read Devorah W's comment that Olmert "will have the condemnation of Jewish history," I thought how optimistic she is to believe there will BE a Jewish history.

[RR]

From Sarah Honig's important column yesterday:

"[Olmert] poses as the executor of Sharon's political last testament, deliberately obscuring the fact that, before his stroke, Sharon stated there'd be no more unilateral moves (not that anything he said could be taken at face value).

"Fawning journalists don't harp on contradictions nor demand to know how Olmert plans to effect a separation between Israelis and Palestinians; how he'll expel 100,000 settlers when he couldn't resettle the 9,000 already uprooted; how a judenrein heart of the Jewish homeland and narrower territorial confines will enhance Israel's security; how his line of retreat will become Israel's new border when neither the Palestinians nor the international community would recognize it; how bestowing free gifts on Hamas would cool its genocidal ardor, and how he'll prevent Kassam rockets from spoiling the fun of Israelis in Kfar Saba or Ben-Gurion Airport."

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1139395618840&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull